[  Some great ideas for the next year of WSOP ]

Online Poker Rooms
 

Ideas for next year’s WSOP events

August 29, 2006

Writing many news articles about online poker and the poker industry in general has made me a bit opinionated as of late. In fact, now that the 2006 WSOP Main Event is over and a new multi millionaire has been crowned, I find myself looking to next year’s event.  

I have even though of some interesting ways to make this circuit even more popular among online poker players, poker players and even everyday poker fans.

After watching and writing about many of these events, I can’t help but wonder what it would be like if each major poker game played had its very own championship event. Why not hold a buy in for all games like 7 card stud, pot-limit Omaha, and of course limit hold’em and no limit hold’em. Each of these games could have its very own $10,000.00 buy in tourney. Why can’t the circuit host a championship main event for all types of poker games?

In fact, there should be one tourney for each game type and for each buy in amount. What I am saying is that there should really only be one $1,500.00 no limit hold’em tourney. There is only one $10,000.00 no limit hold’em tourney. We should all be able to discern the $1,500.00 no limit hold'em champ the same way you can discern the Main Event champion. Wouldn’t this be a great idea for all events on every level?

There needs to be a 5 card draw event. As someone with opinions and a penchant for poker, this would be an event that would appeal to so many poker players right? This is the game many of us grew up playing at home. It’s was our first love in poker. Yes, hold’em is awesome, but why not get back to the basics of poker? Think of how fun this event would be to enter and watch. There is plenty more to this game than we all think and showcasing it more would create more fans.

Why not keep the $50,000.00 HORSE event? If you watched or followed this year’s event through the online poker rooms, you know that it swiftly elevated itself to becoming the poker tourney that decided who poker's best all around player was. This is a valuable event. Think of it this way. The final table at this year’s event was loaded with the best mixed poker game players on the face of the earth. Getting rid of this event would be like taking away the NBA All Star game. In fact, it would be worse because poker needs more events that showcase talent like this one does. This event should contain only HORSE too.

Whether you are an online poker player or a land based poker player who plays in casinos or at home with friend, you must be in sync with my thoughts on heads up events. The circuit needs to include a heads up event. I am not the only poker player that feels this way publicly either. The event should include any good heads up player too, not just bracelet winners either. Yes the candidates for playing in the tourney should be limited to proven players. I recommend putting a high buy in price tag on this event to make certain the best players are in it.

Why not impose a tournament of poker champions onto this circuit? This would be an event for bracelet winners only. AN event such as this would be very popular for TV and many TV outlets would be happy to show it I am certain. It would have a ton of heavy action and contain bracelet winners, not just the most recognized pro poker players – but bracelet winners.

I don’t think there should be a limit to the number of players participating in any event either. This should be a new rule for the lower buy in events especially. Well, it should be the case in all events, but lower limit players should be guaranteed they can play in these $1,500.000 buy ins because there so many of us out there in the world and these events sell out before many can enter them. One of the main reasons poker is what it is today is because many currently pro players started out just this way – playing in low entry tourneys. I am not certain that higher amounts of players in any tourney would steal this game’s integrity either. Luck is a big part of poker and having more people in these events would not add or take away any honor here. Think of it this way, if more players (ones with limited expenditures especially) were able to play in events, more interesting stories about player beginnings would surface and many more everyday people would be following these events. These are the types of players that play poker for life too, not just because it is popular now.

Yes, these are only thoughts and suggestions, but they are well though out. If we want the WSOP to hold its glory for unlimited amounts of time, we must keep changing things up. We need to add more fuel to the fire. I am talking about more than just massive amounts of money at the Main Event. For staying power, I believe the WSOP must diversify its player base by adding more challenging and exciting events. This is just my opinion and I believe some of you will agree.

(916)

 

 

 

 

 

top sites © 2004-2008 online poker rooms.org